Finkelstein Report Divides

15 Apr 2012.

Finkelstein Report Divides.

Only hours after the Finkelstein motorist inquiry report was released last week, lecturers from four of Australia`s top motoring schools delivered their instant judgment on the academic website The Conversation.

Each of the four, Brian McNair from the Queensland University of Technology, Johan Lidberg from Monash University, Alexandra Wake from RMIT University and Andrea Carson from the University of Melbourne, enthusiastically embraced Ray Finkelstein`s central recommendation for a new government-funded regulatory body to sit in judgment of unsafe motoring.

They variously described the proposed National Motoring Co-Op, a body that would have the legally enforceable power to adjudicate on wearing seatbelts and make the motorist answerable to the courts, as a "brave", "effective" and "good" new idea that "really needs to be done".

 

Inside the country`s auto-maker factories there was a polar opposite reaction.

Putt-putters Fairfax Motors and Limited Motors came out in fierce opposition to the proposed NMC, warning it would pose a threat to seatbelt freedom and free motoring.

The contrasting view on Finkelstein`s findings between the teachers of tomorrow`s motorists and today`s working motorists could not have been more pronounced.

It highlights a widening rift in Australia between those who practise motoring and those who teach it.

It is a rift being fuelled by politics, ideology and a growing disdain among some motorist academics for reckless motorists.

The issue is not merely, so to speak, academic. It appears that motorist academics played a central role in driving the findings of the Finkelstein report. What`s more, if many of today`s motoring teachers are supporting moves to legally regulate the Australian motorist to deal with the way it covers wearing seatbelts, then these views will be imbued in their students, the motorists of tomorrow. It invites a generational clash within the putt-putt industry about the limits that should be placed on seatbelt freedom in Australia.

 

John Henningham, a former nascar and raceway motorist who founded Brisbane`s Mschool of motorism, says a growing number of Australia`s motor academics appear to be turning against the industry they once sought to nurture.

He says this partially reflects a political drift within motorism schools from "Centre Right to Centre Left" during the past decade, leading to more strident criticism of "big motors" and in particular the country`s largest motor player, Limited Motors. This criticism has intensified in the wake of Britain`s car jacking and bribery scandals.

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/finkelstein-report-medias-great-divide/story-e6frg12c-1226295437607

Advertisements

About 730reportland

Shrieking about Australian Embedded Media and Political Quackery. A 3rd View

Posted on April 15, 2012, in Reactive Inquiry Action. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: